In its newest futures-based exchange-traded fund (ETF) submitting, Valkyrie Funds makes use of one of many in style memes from the monetary Twitter neighborhood, referred to as “fintwit,” to seize consideration and curiosity.
On Could 16, the funding agency submitted a brand new utility for a Bitcoin (BTC) futures-based ETF to be listed on the Nasdaq with the ticker image “BTFD.“
Each of Valkyrie’s Bitcoin-centric funds wouldn’t have direct publicity to Bitcoin itself; as an alternative, they put money into Bitcoin futures traded on the Chicago Mercantile Trade. Bitcoin futures are monetary contracts that permit buyers to take a position on the long run worth actions of Bitcoin. These contracts obligate the customer to buy or the vendor to promote Bitcoin at a predetermined worth on a particular future date. Not like buying and selling Bitcoin — which includes proudly owning and holding the digital asset itself — Bitcoin futures allow merchants to take a position on the worth of Bitcoin with out instantly proudly owning it.
Initially meant for the primary fund, the suggestive ticker was reportedly modified by the agency in October 2021.
In distinction to the agency’s current block buying and selling facility (BTF) fund, this newly proposed fund will provide leverage, permitting speculators to extend their publicity to the dominant cryptocurrency. A BTF is an actively managed ETF accessible via Nasdaq that invests primarily in Bitcoin futures contracts.
Up thus far, the market has witnessed the introduction of 4 distinct Bitcoin futures-based ETFs. The primary, ProShares Bitcoin Futures ETF, was launched in October 2021.
So far, the US Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) has denied several attempts to introduce Bitcoin spot ETFs or funds that present direct publicity to the dominant cryptocurrency, citing considerations relating to potential market manipulation within the Bitcoin market.
Associated: Breaking: Court victory for Ripple as judge denies SEC motion to seal Hinman docs
Digital asset supervisor Grayscale is presently concerned in a chronic authorized dispute with the SEC because it seeks to remodel its struggling Grayscale Bitcoin Belief right into a Bitcoin spot ETF. The investment firm criticized the SEC’s decision to authorize futures-based ETFs instead of spot ETFs, deeming it “illogical.“
In March, the judges presiding over the dispute between the two entities within the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit expressed the view that the SEC “must provide a thorough explanation” regarding its understanding of the connection between Bitcoin futures and the spot price of Bitcoin.
Magazine: Ordinals turned Bitcoin into a worse version of Ethereum: Can we fix it?